A workshop with 20 experts of diverse backgrounds from five countries in the Americas was convened for two-and-a-half days in March 2012 to discuss and develop a standardized methodology for assessing the economic cost of dengue. This article discusses a number of factors that contributed to the workshop's success, including: engaging the experts at various stages of the process; convening a multidisciplinary group to reduce expert bias and provide a more comprehensive and integrated approach; facilitating guided small- and large-group discussions; developing effective cross-cultural collectivism, trust, communication, and empathy across the expert panel; establishing clear lines of responsibilities within each group of experts; breaking down the complex issues into smaller and simpler ideas; providing ample background materials in multiple languages prior to the workshop. Challenges and areas for improvement are also covered.(AU)Se convocó un taller con 20 expertos provenientes de diversos ámbitos de cinco países de las Américas con el propósito de analizar y elaborar un método normalizado de evaluación del costo económico del dengue; la duración del taller fue de dos días y medio en marzo del 2012. En el presente artículo se analizan diversos factores que contribuyeron al éxito del taller, entre ellos la vinculación de los expertos en diversas.(AU)

Rev Panam Salud Publica;34(3),sept. 2013

Consensus development conferences as topic; Dengue; Guidelines as Topic; Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto; Dengue; Guías como Asunto; Conferências de Consenso como Assunto; Consenso; Dengue; Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto; Região do Caribe; Comunicação; Cultura; Prova Pericial; Metas; Comunicação Interdisciplinar; Cooperação Internacional; Linguagem; América Latina; Manuais como Assunto; Responsabilidade Social

Constenla, Dagna,Lefcourt, Noah,Garcia, Cristina (2013) Expert consensus-building for developing guidelines: lessons learned from a dengue economics workshop. Rev Panam Salud Publica;34(3) 198-203,sep. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1020-49892013000900008