• español
    • English
    • português
  • português 
    • español
    • English
    • português
  • Página inicial
  • Sitio da OPS
  • Índices
  • Coleção completa
  • Sobre o IRIS
  • Memória Institucional
  • Contato
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Ver item 
  •   Página inicial
  • 1.PAHO Headquarters / Sede de la OPS
  • Scientific Journals and Newsletters / Revistas Científicas y Boletines
  • Pan American Journal of Public Health
  • Ver item
  •   Página inicial
  • 1.PAHO Headquarters / Sede de la OPS
  • Scientific Journals and Newsletters / Revistas Científicas y Boletines
  • Pan American Journal of Public Health
  • Ver item

Tamizaje del cáncer colorrectal

Thumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
12902.pdf (81.66Kb)
Data
2002
Autor
Anon
Metadata
Mostrar registro completo
Resumo
This piece summarizes new recommendations from the Preventive Services Task Force of the United States of America concerning screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). These recommendations update and replace ones that were issued in 1996. The Task Force strongly recommends that physicians carry out CRC screening tests for both men and women who are 50 years of age or older. The Task Force found fair or good evidence that: 1) several screening methods are effective in reducing mortality from CRC, 2) the benefits of screening outweigh its risks, although the quality of the tests, the magnitude of the benefits, and the potential harms vary according to the method, and 3) periodic fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) reduces mortality from CRC. In addition, there is fair evidence that sigmoidoscopy, either alone or in combination with FOBT, reduces CRC mortality. There is no direct evidence that screening colonoscopy is effective in reducing CRC mortality, nor is it clear if the greater accuracy of colonoscopy in comparison to other tests compensates for its additional complications, inconvenience, and costs. Double-contrast barium enema is less sensitive than colonoscopy, and there is no direct evidence that it is effective in lowering mortality rates. There are insufficient data to determine which screening strategy is best in terms of the balance of benefits, potential harms, and cost-effectiveness. Regardless of the strategy chosen, CRC screening is likely to be cost-effective (less than US$ 30 000 per year of life gained) (AU)
Título traduzido
Screening for colorectal cancer
Series
Rev Panam Salud Publica;12(4),oct. 2002
URI
http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1020-49892002001000022&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/8506
Cita
Anon (2002) Tamizaje del cáncer colorrectal. Rev Panam Salud Publica;12(4) 291-295,oct. 2002. Retrieved from http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1020-49892002001000022&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Collections
  • Pan American Journal of Public Health

Navegar

Todo o repositórioComunidades e ColeçõesPor data do documentoAutoresTítulosAssuntosTítulo da SerieTipo de materialIdiomasCategoríaUnidade Técnica/Repesentação de paísEsta coleçãoPor data do documentoAutoresTítulosAssuntosTítulo da SerieTipo de materialIdiomasCategoríaUnidade Técnica/Repesentação de país

Estatística

Ver as estatísticas de uso

Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde
Organização Mundial da Saúde. Escritório Regional para as Américas.
525 Twenty-third Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, Estados Unidos
Tel.: +1 (202) 974-3000 Fax: +1 (202) 974-3663
email: libraryhq@paho.org

Links

  • Publicações destacadas da OPAS
  • Biblioteca Digital da OMS (IRIS)
  • Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS)
  • Global Index Medicus (GIM)