When is systematic review replication useful, and when is it wasteful?
Fecha
2021ISSN
1680 5348
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemResumen
To the Editor, During the past quarter of a century and following the global explosion in access to scientific literature, systematic reviews have become an excellent way to inform decisions with summaries of the effects of interventions, and to learn about their impact under different conditions or among populations. Systematic reviews play a key role in ensuring that policy decisions are informed by research. Local and national governments as well as international health organizations now regularly commission and request that systematic reviews inform policy decisions. [...]
Tema
Colecciones
Esta leyenda debe conservarse, junto con la URL original del artículo.Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.
-
Tortosa, Fernando; Donato, Manuel; Torales, Santiago; Gonzalez Malla, Carlos; Uribe, Javier; Izcovich, Ariel (2023)[RESUMEN]. Este informe tiene por objetivo exponer el trabajo realizado sobre el diseño, la publicación y el impacto de las actualizaciones para intervenciones en COVID-19 basadas en la evidencia, para brindar síntesis de ...
-
Brocard, Eva; Reveiz, Ludovic; Régnaux, Jean-Philippe; Abdala, Veronica; Ramón-Pardo, Pilar; del Rio Bueno, Ana (2021)[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. To map the current evidence on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) administration and identify knowledge gaps in the literature available in this field. Methods. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, ...
-
Uchimura, Liza Yurie Teruya; Figueiró, Mabel Fernandes; Silva, Denila Bueno; Paiva, Laís Komatsu de; Chrispim, Pedro Paulo Magalhães; Yonekura, Tatiana (2023)[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Sintetizar as evidências de efetividade dos cuidados de transição em idosos após alta hospitalar para subsidiar gestores para a tomada de decisão. Métodos. Esta revisão sistemática rápida seguiu as ...