When is systematic review replication useful, and when is it wasteful?
Date
2021ISSN
1680 5348
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
To the Editor, During the past quarter of a century and following the global explosion in access to scientific literature, systematic reviews have become an excellent way to inform decisions with summaries of the effects of interventions, and to learn about their impact under different conditions or among populations. Systematic reviews play a key role in ensuring that policy decisions are informed by research. Local and national governments as well as international health organizations now regularly commission and request that systematic reviews inform policy decisions. [...]
Subject
Collections
This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Izcovich, Ariel; Peiris, Sasha; Rada, Gabriel; Tortosa, Fernando; Ragusa, Martín; Reveiz, Ludovic (2025-04-28)[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To develop a living systematic review to deliver continuous, real-time evidence synthesis in the context of a rapidly evolving landscape of studies on potential therapeutic interventions during the ...
-
Tortosa, Fernando; Donato, Manuel; Torales, Santiago; Gonzalez Malla, Carlos; Uribe, Javier; Izcovich, Ariel (2023)[RESUMEN]. Este informe tiene por objetivo exponer el trabajo realizado sobre el diseño, la publicación y el impacto de las actualizaciones para intervenciones en COVID-19 basadas en la evidencia, para brindar síntesis de ...
-
Brocard, Eva; Reveiz, Ludovic; Régnaux, Jean-Philippe; Abdala, Veronica; Ramón-Pardo, Pilar; del Rio Bueno, Ana (2021)[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. To map the current evidence on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) administration and identify knowledge gaps in the literature available in this field. Methods. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, ...