When is systematic review replication useful, and when is it wasteful?
MetadataShow full item record
To the Editor, During the past quarter of a century and following the global explosion in access to scientific literature, systematic reviews have become an excellent way to inform decisions with summaries of the effects of interventions, and to learn about their impact under different conditions or among populations. Systematic reviews play a key role in ensuring that policy decisions are informed by research. Local and national governments as well as international health organizations now regularly commission and request that systematic reviews inform policy decisions. [...]
This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
De Oliveira, Lucia Helena; Jauregui, Barbara; Carvalho, Ana Flavia; Giglio, Norberto (2017-12)[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. To summarize and critically evaluate the evidence on the impact and effectiveness of meningococcal vaccination programs around the world in order to inform decision-making in Latin America and the ...
Porudominsky, Ruben; Gotuzzo, Eduardo H. (2018-05)[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To evaluate contraindications and precautions for the yellow fever vaccine (YFV) in risk populations. Methods. A literature review was conducted by searching PubMed for “yellow fever vaccine” and ...
Energy interventions that facilitate sustainable development and impact health: an overview of systematic reviews Haby, Michelle M.; Chapman, Evelina; Clark, Rachel; Galvão, Luiz A.C. (2016-04)Objective. To inform policy by providing an overview of systematic reviews on interventions that facilitate sustainable energy use and have a positive impact on health. Methods. Systematic review methods were used to ...