Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartins-Filho, Paulo Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Victor Santana
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-03T15:35:55Z
dc.date.available2020-04-03T15:35:55Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.citationMartins-Filho PR and Santos VS. No evidence supports the use of ether and chloroform inhalation for treating COVID-19. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020;44:e41. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.41en_US
dc.identifier.issn1680 5348
dc.identifier.urihttps://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/51972
dc.description.abstractDear Editor, SARS-CoV-2 has been spreading rapidly across the world as well as the number of fake news on social media regarding harmful or non-harmful treatments which are ineffective for treating COVID-19. In Brazil, the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed on February 26, 2020 and until March 20, 2020 at least 970 cases and seven deaths have been reported. The fear and uncertainty have led people to consume and share mistrust and misinformation on the Internet. Since the first confirmed case in Brazil, fake news about the effectiveness of an ether and chloroform blend known as “lança perfume” or “loló” were spread on social media. Nowadays, the ecosystem of big data has provided valuable information about online health-related behaviour and new patterns among population groups using social media data. Google Trends may act as an efficient real time surveillance system by monitoring hit searches of specific health issues leading to reliable and meaningful indicators to track health information demand and supply trends. We used Google Trends to assess recent search activity (from February 25 to March 20, 2020) on the novel coronavirus in Brazil and the popularity of related search terms. Related searches for coronavirus revealed a high level of interest (a breakout over 5000%) on the information about the use of an ether and chloroform blend in treating COVID-19, especially in the North and Northeast regions which are recognized as the poorest regions in the country.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRev Panam Salud Publica;44, mar. 2020
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_US
dc.subjectSARS Virusen_US
dc.subjectSevere Acute Respiratory Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectBrazilen_US
dc.subjectChloroformen_US
dc.subjectEtheren_US
dc.titleNo evidence supports the use of ether and chloroform inhalation for treating COVID-19en_US
dc.typeJournal articlesen_US
dc.rights.holderPan American Health Organizationen_US
paho.articletypeLettersen_US
paho.isfeatured0en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.41
paho.source.centercodeUS1.1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Panamericana de Salud Públicaes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPan American Journal of Public Health


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record