Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMariño, Rodrigoes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2016
dc.date.available2016
dc.date.issued1995es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/26877
dc.description.abstractThis article presents the argument that because of several demonstrated advantages, milk fluoridation provides a valid alternative to water fluoridation when the latter is not possible. Extensive literature describing study of fluoride compounds administered with calcium-rich food, as well clinical trials and laboratory experiments with fluoridated milk, have demonstrated its effectiveness in caries prevention. The main criticisms of milk fluoridation are decreased bioavailability of the fluoride, the cost and administrative burden involved, and (in some cases) lack of sound clinical conclusions regarding its preventive efficacy. These criticisms are reviewed in the light of evidence now availableen_US
dc.description.abstractThis article will also be published in Spanish in the BOSP. Vol. 120(2), Feb. 1996en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBulletin of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO);29(4),dec. 1995en_US
dc.subjectFluoridationes_ES
dc.subjectMilkes_ES
dc.subjectDental Carieses_ES
dc.titleShould we use milk fluoridation? a reviewes_ES
dc.typeJournal articlesen_US
dc.rights.holderPan American Health Organizationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record