Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnones
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-25T14:53:35Z
dc.date.available2015-08-25T14:53:35Z
dc.date.issued2002es
dc.identifier.citationAnon (2002) Tamizaje del cáncer colorrectal. Rev Panam Salud Publica;12(4) 291-295,oct. 2002. Retrieved from http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1020-49892002001000022&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=eses
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1020-49892002001000022&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=eses
dc.identifier.urihttp://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/8506
dc.format.extenttabes
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRev Panam Salud Publica;12(4),oct. 2002es
dc.titleTamizaje del cáncer colorrectales
dc.title.alternativeScreening for colorectal canceres
dc.typeJournal Articlees
dc.description.notesThis piece summarizes new recommendations from the Preventive Services Task Force of the United States of America concerning screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). These recommendations update and replace ones that were issued in 1996. The Task Force strongly recommends that physicians carry out CRC screening tests for both men and women who are 50 years of age or older. The Task Force found fair or good evidence that: 1) several screening methods are effective in reducing mortality from CRC, 2) the benefits of screening outweigh its risks, although the quality of the tests, the magnitude of the benefits, and the potential harms vary according to the method, and 3) periodic fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) reduces mortality from CRC. In addition, there is fair evidence that sigmoidoscopy, either alone or in combination with FOBT, reduces CRC mortality. There is no direct evidence that screening colonoscopy is effective in reducing CRC mortality, nor is it clear if the greater accuracy of colonoscopy in comparison to other tests compensates for its additional complications, inconvenience, and costs. Double-contrast barium enema is less sensitive than colonoscopy, and there is no direct evidence that it is effective in lowering mortality rates. There are insufficient data to determine which screening strategy is best in terms of the balance of benefits, potential harms, and cost-effectiveness. Regardless of the strategy chosen, CRC screening is likely to be cost-effective (less than US$ 30 000 per year of life gained) (AU)es


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record